Annuities: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend annuities. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
6 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

MassMutual led the annuities benchmark in September 2026 with 68.3% valid recommendation coverage, 5.7 points ahead of Allianz Life and New York Life, which were tied at 62.6%. Valid recommendation coverage measures the share of qualified observations where a brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist. The largest month-over-month coverage increase came from Allianz Life, which rose to 62.6% in September 2026 from 21.7% in August 2026. The largest month-over-month decline was Pacific Life, which fell to 21.6% in September 2026 from 31.7% in August 2026.

The full July-to-September series shows a recovery month after a sharp August contraction. MassMutual led in each month of the series. Two brands posted declines beyond normal month-to-month variation relative to baseline: Corebridge Financial and New York Life. Eight brands moved within normal variation over the full series.

The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 227 qualified observations in September 2026 after qualification.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026

0%20%40%60%80%Jul 2026Aug 2026Sep 2026
  • MassMutual68.3%
  • Allianz Life62.6%
  • New York Life62.6%
  • Nationwide58.6%
  • Athene56.0%
  • Pacific Life21.6%
  • Lincoln Financial20.7%
  • Corebridge Financial10.6%
  • Fidelity4.9%
  • Brighthouse Financial1.8%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

246

227

Down 19

Tracked brands

10

10

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

33.7%

49.8%

Up 16.1 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

82.5%

78.4%

Down 4.1 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

MassMutual

MassMutual

No change

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. August 2026 saw the lowest qualified observation count in the series at 161, with a corresponding dip in coverage rates across most brands.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Annuities

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark denominator reflects qualified observations only, after off-topic and irrelevant prompts are removed from the underlying collection. Every brand-level percentage in this report uses the qualified observation count as its denominator, not the raw collection volume.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

800

800

Raw collection volume

Unique questions

496

537

Distinct questions asked

Brand / competitor mentions

800

800

Prompts mentioning a brand

Relevant observations

289

282

On-topic responses

Irrelevant observations

511

518

Off-topic responses

Qualified benchmark observations

246

227

Public denominator

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology

Current Brand Standings

This table is the primary current-month benchmark view.

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

MassMutual

86.3%

68.3%

37.4%

9.2%

0.9

Allianz Life

76.2%

62.6%

48.5%

11.0%

1.0

New York Life

81.1%

62.6%

47.1%

27.3%

1.0

Nationwide

74.5%

58.6%

18.5%

2.6%

0.9

Athene

70.5%

56.0%

26.9%

11.0%

0.9

Pacific Life

26.0%

21.6%

5.3%

1.8%

0.9

Lincoln Financial

27.8%

20.7%

2.6%

0.9%

1.0

Corebridge Financial

15.4%

10.6%

3.1%

0.0%

0.9

Fidelity

16.7%

4.9%

0.9%

0.4%

0.4

Brighthouse Financial

1.8%

1.8%

0.0%

0.0%

1.0

Note: presence rate and net sentiment figures are rounded to one decimal place in the source data.

How to Read the Standings

Presence rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned. Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist. Top-three rate is the share where the brand appears in the first three recommendation slots. Rank-one rate is the share where the brand is the first recommendation. Net sentiment describes the framing of benchmark mentions, not customer sentiment, and reflects the share of positive mentions minus negative mentions among mentions.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

Movement since baseline

Allianz Life

64.6%

62.6%

Down 2.0 points

Athene

56.1%

56.0%

Down 0.1 points

Brighthouse Financial

1.2%

1.8%

Up 0.6 points

Corebridge Financial

20.7%

10.6%

Down 10.1 points

Fidelity

8.1%

4.9%

Down 3.2 points

Lincoln Financial

21.9%

20.7%

Down 1.2 points

MassMutual

74.0%

68.3%

Down 5.7 points

Nationwide

61.4%

58.6%

Down 2.8 points

New York Life

71.5%

62.6%

Down 8.9 points

Pacific Life

22.4%

21.6%

Down 0.8 points

Several brands posted large month-over-month recoveries in September 2026 after August declines. Allianz Life rose 40.9 points from August to September, Athene rose 34.9 points, and MassMutual rose 22.3 points, all beyond normal month-to-month variation. Pacific Life fell 10.1 points from August to September, also beyond normal variation.

Largest Decline: Corebridge Financial

Corebridge Financial fell to 10.6% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 from 20.7% in July 2026, the largest decline in the three-month series. The decline was accompanied by a drop in raw mention presence to 15.4% in September 2026 from 25.6% in July 2026. The brand did recover from a low of 5.0% in August 2026, rising 5.6 points into September, but remained below its July level.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Additional Significant Decline: New York Life

New York Life fell to 62.6% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 from 71.5% in July 2026, a decline beyond normal month-to-month variation. Despite the coverage decline, the brand's rank-one rate rose to 27.3% in September 2026 from 19.1% in July 2026. New York Life posted the highest rank-one rate in the benchmark for September 2026.

Category Leader: MassMutual

MassMutual remained the category leader at 68.3% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, though its coverage fell from 74.0% in July 2026. MassMutual also posted the highest presence rate in the benchmark at 86.3% in September 2026. Allianz Life and New York Life moved into a tie for second at 62.6%.

MassMutual's rank-one rate fell to 9.2% in September 2026 from 20.3% in July 2026, while its raw presence rate held steady at 86.3% in September 2026 compared with 85.0% in July 2026.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. New York Life posted a 27.3% rank-one rate in September 2026, the highest in the benchmark, despite sharing the second-place coverage position with Allianz Life at 62.6%.

Brand

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

Sep 2026 top-three rate

Sep 2026 rank-one rate

New York Life

49.6%

19.1%

47.1%

27.3%

Allianz Life

55.7%

21.5%

48.5%

11.0%

MassMutual

45.5%

20.3%

37.4%

9.2%

Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates. New York Life and Allianz Life matched on coverage in September 2026, but New York Life held a rank-one rate more than double Allianz Life's.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

Brand Recommendation

246

227

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

246

227

The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Jul 2026

246

MassMutual

74.0%

Baseline month (no prior comparison)

Aug 2026

161

MassMutual

46.0%

Allianz Life down 42.9 points

Sep 2026

227

MassMutual

68.3%

Allianz Life up 40.9 points

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often and how prominently brands appear in AI-generated recommendations across six canonical AI surface families. Each month, a standardized set of prompts is run across ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode, then qualified through a public research funnel.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.