Annuities: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend annuities. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: Corebridge Financial
- 08Additional Significant Decline: New York Life
- 09Category Leader: MassMutual
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
MassMutual led the annuities benchmark in September 2026 with 68.3% valid recommendation coverage, 5.7 points ahead of Allianz Life and New York Life, which were tied at 62.6%. Valid recommendation coverage measures the share of qualified observations where a brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist. The largest month-over-month coverage increase came from Allianz Life, which rose to 62.6% in September 2026 from 21.7% in August 2026. The largest month-over-month decline was Pacific Life, which fell to 21.6% in September 2026 from 31.7% in August 2026.
The full July-to-September series shows a recovery month after a sharp August contraction. MassMutual led in each month of the series. Two brands posted declines beyond normal month-to-month variation relative to baseline: Corebridge Financial and New York Life. Eight brands moved within normal variation over the full series.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 227 qualified observations in September 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- MassMutual68.3%
- Allianz Life62.6%
- New York Life62.6%
- Nationwide58.6%
- Athene56.0%
- Pacific Life21.6%
- Lincoln Financial20.7%
- Corebridge Financial10.6%
- Fidelity4.9%
- Brighthouse Financial1.8%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 246 | 227 | Down 19 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 33.7% | 49.8% | Up 16.1 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 82.5% | 78.4% | Down 4.1 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | MassMutual | MassMutual | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. August 2026 saw the lowest qualified observation count in the series at 161, with a corresponding dip in coverage rates across most brands.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Annuities
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark denominator reflects qualified observations only, after off-topic and irrelevant prompts are removed from the underlying collection. Every brand-level percentage in this report uses the qualified observation count as its denominator, not the raw collection volume.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Raw collection volume |
Unique questions | 496 | 537 | Distinct questions asked |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning a brand |
Relevant observations | 289 | 282 | On-topic responses |
Irrelevant observations | 511 | 518 | Off-topic responses |
Qualified benchmark observations | 246 | 227 | Public denominator |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
This table is the primary current-month benchmark view.
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MassMutual | 86.3% | 68.3% | 37.4% | 9.2% | 0.9 |
Allianz Life | 76.2% | 62.6% | 48.5% | 11.0% | 1.0 |
New York Life | 81.1% | 62.6% | 47.1% | 27.3% | 1.0 |
Nationwide | 74.5% | 58.6% | 18.5% | 2.6% | 0.9 |
Athene | 70.5% | 56.0% | 26.9% | 11.0% | 0.9 |
Pacific Life | 26.0% | 21.6% | 5.3% | 1.8% | 0.9 |
Lincoln Financial | 27.8% | 20.7% | 2.6% | 0.9% | 1.0 |
Corebridge Financial | 15.4% | 10.6% | 3.1% | 0.0% | 0.9 |
Fidelity | 16.7% | 4.9% | 0.9% | 0.4% | 0.4 |
Brighthouse Financial | 1.8% | 1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.0 |
Note: presence rate and net sentiment figures are rounded to one decimal place in the source data.
How to Read the Standings
Presence rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned. Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist. Top-three rate is the share where the brand appears in the first three recommendation slots. Rank-one rate is the share where the brand is the first recommendation. Net sentiment describes the framing of benchmark mentions, not customer sentiment, and reflects the share of positive mentions minus negative mentions among mentions.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Allianz Life | 64.6% | 62.6% | Down 2.0 points |
Athene | 56.1% | 56.0% | Down 0.1 points |
Brighthouse Financial | 1.2% | 1.8% | Up 0.6 points |
Corebridge Financial | 20.7% | 10.6% | Down 10.1 points |
Fidelity | 8.1% | 4.9% | Down 3.2 points |
Lincoln Financial | 21.9% | 20.7% | Down 1.2 points |
MassMutual | 74.0% | 68.3% | Down 5.7 points |
Nationwide | 61.4% | 58.6% | Down 2.8 points |
New York Life | 71.5% | 62.6% | Down 8.9 points |
Pacific Life | 22.4% | 21.6% | Down 0.8 points |
Several brands posted large month-over-month recoveries in September 2026 after August declines. Allianz Life rose 40.9 points from August to September, Athene rose 34.9 points, and MassMutual rose 22.3 points, all beyond normal month-to-month variation. Pacific Life fell 10.1 points from August to September, also beyond normal variation.
Largest Decline: Corebridge Financial
Corebridge Financial fell to 10.6% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 from 20.7% in July 2026, the largest decline in the three-month series. The decline was accompanied by a drop in raw mention presence to 15.4% in September 2026 from 25.6% in July 2026. The brand did recover from a low of 5.0% in August 2026, rising 5.6 points into September, but remained below its July level.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Additional Significant Decline: New York Life
New York Life fell to 62.6% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 from 71.5% in July 2026, a decline beyond normal month-to-month variation. Despite the coverage decline, the brand's rank-one rate rose to 27.3% in September 2026 from 19.1% in July 2026. New York Life posted the highest rank-one rate in the benchmark for September 2026.
Category Leader: MassMutual
MassMutual remained the category leader at 68.3% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, though its coverage fell from 74.0% in July 2026. MassMutual also posted the highest presence rate in the benchmark at 86.3% in September 2026. Allianz Life and New York Life moved into a tie for second at 62.6%.
MassMutual's rank-one rate fell to 9.2% in September 2026 from 20.3% in July 2026, while its raw presence rate held steady at 86.3% in September 2026 compared with 85.0% in July 2026.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. New York Life posted a 27.3% rank-one rate in September 2026, the highest in the benchmark, despite sharing the second-place coverage position with Allianz Life at 62.6%.
Brand | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate | Sep 2026 top-three rate | Sep 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
New York Life | 49.6% | 19.1% | 47.1% | 27.3% |
Allianz Life | 55.7% | 21.5% | 48.5% | 11.0% |
MassMutual | 45.5% | 20.3% | 37.4% | 9.2% |
Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates. New York Life and Allianz Life matched on coverage in September 2026, but New York Life held a rank-one rate more than double Allianz Life's.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 246 | 227 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 246 | 227 |
The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 246 | MassMutual | 74.0% | Baseline month (no prior comparison) |
Aug 2026 | 161 | MassMutual | 46.0% | Allianz Life down 42.9 points |
Sep 2026 | 227 | MassMutual | 68.3% | Allianz Life up 40.9 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often and how prominently brands appear in AI-generated recommendations across six canonical AI surface families. Each month, a standardized set of prompts is run across ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode, then qualified through a public research funnel.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Prestige Makeup Brands: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Portable Power Stations and Off-grid Power: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Outdoor Apparel and Technical Outfits: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read