Adjustable Beds: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend adjustable beds. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: Saatva
- 08Other Significant Increases
- 09Largest Decline: GhostBed
- 10Category Leader: Saatva
- 11Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 12Buyer-Intent Distribution
Benchmark Summary
Saatva led the Adjustable Beds benchmark in August 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 73.5%, up from 56.8% in July 2026. Tempur-Pedic followed at 60.8% in August 2026, a gain from 47.6% in July 2026, leaving a 12.7-point gap between the two leaders.
The largest coverage increase belonged to Saatva, which rose 16.7 points from 56.8% in July 2026 to 73.5% in August 2026. The largest coverage decline was GhostBed, which fell 3.1 points from 10.3% in July 2026 to 7.2% in August 2026.
This was a month of notable movement across the category. Beyond the leader, three other brands registered gains beyond normal month-to-month variation: Tempur-Pedic rose 13.2 points from 47.6% in July 2026 to 60.8% in August 2026, Nectar rose 7.7 points from 56.5% to 64.2%, and Reverie rose 3.6 points from 0.9% to 4.5%. No brand recorded a significant decline this month.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 332 qualified observations after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- Saatva+16.7% · beyond normal variationJul 202656.8%Aug 202673.5%
- Nectar+7.7% · beyond normal variationJul 202656.5%Aug 202664.2%
- Tempur-Pedic+13.2% · beyond normal variationJul 202647.6%Aug 202660.8%
- Purple+2.4%Jul 202630.7%Aug 202633.1%
- Lucid+2.4%Jul 202613.3%Aug 202615.7%
- Amerisleep+0.3%Jul 202612.4%Aug 202612.7%
- Sleep Number-0.8%Jul 202613.1%Aug 202612.3%
- GhostBed-3.1%Jul 202610.3%Aug 20267.2%
- Reverie+3.6% · beyond normal variationJul 20260.9%Aug 20264.5%
- Leggett & Platt+0.9%Jul 20263.0%Aug 20263.9%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 563 | 332 | Down 231 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 44.8% | 57.2% | Up 12.4 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 63.4% | 73.2% | Up 9.8 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Saatva (56.8%) | Saatva (73.5%) | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the number of canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation. The six families tracked are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Adjustable Beds
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected |
Unique questions | 622 | 332 | Distinct questions asked |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 332 | Prompts mentioning a tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 724 | 332 | On-topic prompts |
Irrelevant observations | 76 | 76 | Off-topic prompts |
Qualified benchmark observations | 563 | 332 | Public denominator |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. Link: AI Market Discovery Methodology.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Saatva | 89.5% | 73.5% | 53.0% | 25.9% | 0.8 |
Nectar | 78.0% | 64.2% | 31.0% | 9.3% | 0.8 |
Tempur-Pedic | 89.2% | 60.8% | 35.5% | 11.5% | 0.7 |
Purple | 57.8% | 33.1% | 9.6% | 0.0% | 0.6 |
Lucid | 17.5% | 15.7% | 2.1% | 0.3% | 0.9 |
Amerisleep | 14.2% | 12.7% | 4.8% | 0.9% | 0.9 |
Sleep Number | 25.6% | 12.3% | 4.2% | 1.5% | 0.5 |
GhostBed | 10.8% | 7.2% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.7 |
Reverie | 4.8% | 4.5% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.9 |
Leggett & Platt | 6.6% | 3.9% | 1.5% | 0.9% | 0.6 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned at all.
- Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a genuine recommendation context.
- Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is recommended in the top three positions.
- Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment: reflects the balance of positive versus negative framing the brand receives within the benchmark's qualified observations, not customer satisfaction.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Amerisleep | 12.4% | 12.7% | Up 0.3 points |
GhostBed | 10.3% | 7.2% | Down 3.1 points |
Leggett & Platt | 3.0% | 3.9% | Up 0.9 points |
Lucid | 13.3% | 15.7% | Up 2.4 points |
Nectar | 56.5% | 64.2% | Up 7.7 points |
Purple | 30.7% | 33.1% | Up 2.4 points |
Reverie | 0.9% | 4.5% | Up 3.6 points |
Saatva | 56.8% | 73.5% | Up 16.7 points |
Sleep Number | 13.1% | 12.3% | Down 0.8 points |
Tempur-Pedic | 47.6% | 60.8% | Up 13.2 points |
Largest Increase: Saatva
Saatva posted the largest coverage gain in August 2026, rising 16.7 points from 56.8% to 73.5%. The gain was driven substantially by placement improvements: its top-three rate rose 16.8 points from 36.2% to 53.0%, and its rank-one rate rose 11.7 points from 14.2% to 25.9%, both beyond normal month-to-month variation. Presence rate held steady at 89.5% in August 2026, up slightly from 88.3% in July 2026.
Other Significant Increases
Tempur-Pedic rose 13.2 points from 47.6% in July 2026 to 60.8% in August 2026, with its top-three rate up 9.4 points from 26.1% to 35.5%. Nectar rose 7.7 points from 56.5% in July 2026 to 64.2% in August 2026; its presence rate fell 9.2 points from 87.2% to 78.0%, yet its recommendation coverage rose, meaning it was recommended more often relative to its mentions. Reverie rose 3.6 points from 0.9% in July 2026 to 4.5% in August 2026, on a presence rate that climbed 2.9 points from 1.9% to 4.8%; this move starts from a small base of 15 qualified recommendations.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Largest Decline: GhostBed
GhostBed recorded the largest coverage decline in August 2026, down 3.1 points from 10.3% to 7.2%. Its presence rate fell 5.9 points from 16.7% to 10.8%, its top-three rate fell 3.2 points from 4.4% to 1.2%, and its rank-one rate fell 1.4 points from 1.4% to 0.0%, all beyond normal month-to-month variation. Coverage now stands at 24 qualified recommendations in August 2026.
Category Leader: Saatva
Saatva leads the category with 73.5% valid recommendation coverage in August 2026, up from 56.8% in July 2026, with a 12.7-point lead over Tempur-Pedic. Its rank-one rate of 25.9% also led the category, more than double the next closest brand.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Saatva leads both coverage and placement, sitting in the top three in 53.0% of observations and as the first recommendation in 25.9% of observations in August 2026. Tempur-Pedic and Nectar form a tighter cluster behind it.
Brand | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Saatva | 53.0% | 25.9% | 36.2% | 14.2% |
Tempur-Pedic | 35.5% | 11.5% | 26.1% | 7.6% |
Nectar | 31.0% | 9.3% | 29.8% | 11.6% |
Similar coverage can still hide different first-position rates: Nectar and Tempur-Pedic sit close on top-three placement, yet Tempur-Pedic holds a slightly higher rank-one rate.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 563 | 332 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 563 | 332 |
Because all observations sit in one class, the current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 563 | Saatva | 56.8% | N/A |
Aug 2026 | 332 | Saatva | 73.5% | Saatva, up 16.7 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private and sponsored channels. A metric movement alone does not establish causality.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index is a neutral, industry-level benchmark tracking how AI and search surfaces present and recommend brands across canonical surface families. New measurements are added to the same evergreen report.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.