Pet Health Supplements and Wellness: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend pet health supplements and wellness. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
5 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

Zesty Paws led valid recommendation coverage in August 2026 at 72.3%, ahead of VetriScience (FoodScience LLC) by 15.1 points, which posted 57.2%. The largest coverage increase was NaturVet, rising to 28.3% in August 2026 from 23.5% in July 2026. The largest coverage decline was Native Pet, falling to 35.3% in August 2026 from 43.6% in July 2026.

The month showed movement beyond normal variation for one brand: Native Pet's decline of 8.3 points marked the brand's first month of decline in the series. Most other brands moved within normal month-to-month variation, with VetriScience (FoodScience LLC) gaining 2.5 points to 57.2% in August 2026 from 54.7% in July 2026, while Zesty Paws eased 2.4 points from 74.7% in July 2026 to 72.3% in August 2026.

The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 589 qualified observations in August 2026 after qualification.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026

  • Zesty Paws-2.4%
    Jul 202674.7%
    Aug 202672.3%
  • VetriScience (FoodScience LLC)+2.5%
    Jul 202654.7%
    Aug 202657.2%
  • Native Pet-8.3% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202643.6%
    Aug 202635.3%
  • Nutramax Laboratories-2.7%
    Jul 202633.9%
    Aug 202631.2%
  • NaturVet+4.8%
    Jul 202623.5%
    Aug 202628.3%
  • Honest Paws+0.4%
    Jul 20268.4%
    Aug 20268.8%
  • Solid Gold Pet-0.3%
    Jul 20261.8%
    Aug 20261.5%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

605

589

Down 16

Tracked brands

7

7

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

69.3%

65.4%

Down 3.9 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

86.9%

87.1%

Up 0.2 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

Zesty Paws (74.7%)

Zesty Paws (72.3%)

Down 2.4 points

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Both months showed all six families present.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Pet Health Supplements and Wellness

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

800

800

Raw collection universe

Unique questions

522

572

Distinct questions asked

Brand / competitor mentions

800

800

Prompts mentioning a brand

Relevant observations

786

773

On-topic for the vertical

Irrelevant observations

14

27

Off-topic for the vertical

Qualified benchmark observations

605

589

Public denominator

For full methodology, see AI Market Discovery Methodology.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Current Brand Standings

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Zesty Paws

79.6%

72.3%

55.0%

21.4%

0.9

VetriScience (FoodScience LLC)

61.5%

57.2%

44.1%

18.9%

1.0

Native Pet

38.2%

35.3%

23.4%

4.6%

1.0

Nutramax Laboratories

34.0%

31.2%

25.1%

12.9%

1.0

NaturVet

31.9%

28.3%

15.1%

2.4%

0.9

Honest Paws

9.5%

8.8%

5.1%

2.7%

0.9

Solid Gold Pet

1.9%

1.5%

0.9%

0.2%

0.8

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned at all.
  • Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand appears with a clearly attributable recommendation.
  • Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the first three recommended positions.
  • Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the single first recommended option.
  • Net sentiment: positive mentions minus negative mentions divided by total mentions, on a scale from -1 to 1.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement since baseline

Honest Paws

8.4%

8.8%

Up 0.4 points

Native Pet

43.6%

35.3%

Down 8.3 points

NaturVet

23.5%

28.3%

Up 4.8 points

Nutramax Laboratories

33.9%

31.2%

Down 2.7 points

Solid Gold Pet

1.8%

1.5%

Down 0.3 points

VetriScience (FoodScience LLC)

54.7%

57.2%

Up 2.5 points

Zesty Paws

74.7%

72.3%

Down 2.4 points

The immediate prior month is the baseline month in this two-month series, so prior-to-current moves match baseline-to-current moves.

Largest Increase: NaturVet

NaturVet posted the largest coverage increase in the category, rising to 28.3% in August 2026 from 23.5% in July 2026, a gain of 4.8 points that remained within normal month-to-month variation. Presence rate rose to 31.9% in August 2026 from 29.9% in July 2026, and top-three rate rose to 15.1% from 11.7% over the same period. Rank-one rate held nearly flat at 2.4% in August 2026, indicating coverage growth has not translated into first-choice preference.

Largest Decline: Native Pet

Native Pet's valid recommendation coverage fell to 35.3% in August 2026 from 43.6% in July 2026, a decline of 8.3 points that moved beyond normal month-to-month variation. The drop appears across supporting signals: presence rate fell to 38.2% in August 2026 from 47.3% in July 2026, and top-three rate fell to 23.4% from 29.9% over the same period. The decline is broad-based, not limited to a single placement metric.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Category Leader: Zesty Paws

Zesty Paws remained the category leader in valid recommendation coverage at 72.3% in August 2026, down 2.4 points from 74.7% in July 2026, within normal month-to-month variation. Its top-three rate held at 55.0% in August 2026, up slightly from 54.4% in July 2026. The gap to the next brand, VetriScience (FoodScience LLC), narrowed to 15.1 points as VetriScience gained 2.5 points over the same period.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The leading brands show distinct placement patterns.

Brand

Aug 2026 top-three rate

Aug 2026 rank-one rate

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

Zesty Paws

55.0%

21.4%

54.4%

21.5%

VetriScience (FoodScience LLC)

44.1%

18.9%

39.8%

13.9%

Nutramax Laboratories

25.1%

12.9%

29.6%

16.4%

Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates. VetriScience (FoodScience LLC) narrowed the top-three gap to Zesty Paws while also raising its rank-one rate to 18.9% in August 2026 from 13.9% in July 2026.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Brand Recommendation

605

589

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

605

589

The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Jul 2026

605

Zesty Paws

74.7%

Native Pet, Down 8.3 points (to Aug 2026)

Aug 2026

589

Zesty Paws

72.3%

Native Pet, Down 8.3 points

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure:

  • Market share or attributable sales outcomes.
  • Every possible AI response or surface.
  • Organic-search ranking positions.
  • Social mention volume or sentiment outside AI answer surfaces.
  • Private or sponsored channels.
  • Causality from any single metric movement alone.

The single-month movement in Native Pet should not yet be treated as a trend; the current dataset cannot answer pricing, value, or head-to-head comparison questions.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how brands appear, are recommended, and are positioned across major AI chat and search surfaces in a given vertical. It is a neutral, audit-style measurement designed for repeatable month-to-month comparison of presence, valid recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.