Pet Health Supplements and Wellness: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend pet health supplements and wellness. This public AI Visibility Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
9 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which pet supplement brand led valid recommendation coverage in October 2026?
  • Which brands posted the largest coverage gain and decline since July 2026?

Zesty Paws led valid recommendation coverage in October 2026 at 76.5%, ahead of VetriScience (FoodScience LLC) by 17.1 points, which posted 59.4%. The largest coverage increase was NaturVet, rising to 31.1% in October 2026 from 23.5% in July 2026, up 7.6 points. The largest coverage decline was Native Pet, falling to 32.4% in October 2026 from 43.6% in July 2026, down 11.2 points.

Across the full July 2026 to October 2026 series, the month was mixed. NaturVet rose in each of the three months since July 2026, from 23.5% in July 2026 to 28.3% in August 2026, 29.9% in September 2026, and 31.1% in October 2026, the largest baseline-to-current increase in the category. Honest Paws also rose in each of the three months since July 2026, from 8.4% to 8.8% in August 2026, 9.3% in September 2026, and 12.5% in October 2026. Native Pet moved beyond normal variation to the downside across the series, falling from 43.6% in July 2026 to 35.3% in August 2026, 28.9% in September 2026, and 32.4% in October 2026, though it rose 3.5 points from September 2026 within normal variation. Nutramax Laboratories, Solid Gold Pet, VetriScience (FoodScience LLC), and Zesty Paws moved within normal month-to-month variation since baseline, though VetriScience and Zesty Paws each posted prior-month gains that moved beyond normal variation.

The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 544 qualified observations in October 2026 after qualification.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Oct 2026

0%20%40%60%80%Jul 2026Aug 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
  • Zesty Paws76.5%
  • VetriScience (FoodScience LLC)59.4%
  • Native Pet32.4%
  • Nutramax Laboratories32.2%
  • NaturVet31.1%
  • Honest Paws12.5%
  • Solid Gold Pet1.3%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Oct 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

605

544

Down 61

Tracked brands

7

7

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

69.3%

67.5%

Down 1.8 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

86.9%

95.6%

Up 8.7 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

Zesty Paws (74.7%)

Zesty Paws (76.5%)

Up 1.8 points

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All four months in the series showed all six families present. August 2026 and September 2026, the intermediate months, logged 589 and 582 qualified observations respectively, with Zesty Paws leading both at 72.3% and 67.5%.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Pet Health Supplements and Wellness

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Oct 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

800

800

Raw collection universe

Unique questions

522

558

Distinct questions asked

Brand / competitor mentions

800

800

Prompts mentioning a brand

Relevant observations

786

782

On-topic for the vertical

Irrelevant observations

14

18

Off-topic for the vertical

Qualified benchmark observations

605

544

Public denominator

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. For full methodology, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology.

Current Brand Standings

Questions This Section Answers

  • How did the seven tracked pet supplement brands rank by valid recommendation coverage in October 2026?
  • Which brands converted presence into top-three recommendations most effectively?
  • How did net sentiment compare across the tracked brands?

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Zesty Paws

80.3%

76.5%

69.8%

30.1%

1.0

VetriScience (FoodScience LLC)

62.0%

59.4%

51.5%

18.9%

1.0

Native Pet

33.6%

32.4%

25.6%

4.4%

1.0

Nutramax Laboratories

33.5%

32.2%

28.5%

16.4%

1.0

NaturVet

33.1%

31.1%

22.4%

3.1%

0.9

Honest Paws

14.0%

12.5%

8.8%

2.9%

0.9

Solid Gold Pet

1.5%

1.3%

0.5%

0.0%

0.9

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned at all.
  • Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand appears with a clearly attributable recommendation.
  • Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the first three recommended positions.
  • Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the single first recommended option.
  • Net sentiment: positive mentions minus negative mentions divided by total mentions, on a scale from -1 to 1.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Questions This Section Answers

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

  • Which pet supplement brands gained or lost the most valid recommendation coverage since July 2026?
  • Which month-to-month shifts went beyond normal variation?

Brand

Jul 2026

Oct 2026

Movement since baseline

Honest Paws

8.4%

12.5%

Up 4.1 points

Native Pet

43.6%

32.4%

Down 11.2 points

NaturVet

23.5%

31.1%

Up 7.6 points

Nutramax Laboratories

33.9%

32.2%

Down 1.7 points

Solid Gold Pet

1.8%

1.3%

Down 0.5 points

VetriScience (FoodScience LLC)

54.7%

59.4%

Up 4.7 points

Zesty Paws

74.7%

76.5%

Up 1.8 points

From baseline to the current period, NaturVet posted the largest increase in the category (up 7.6 points) and Honest Paws also posted a significant increase (up 4.1 points), while Native Pet posted the largest decline (down 11.2 points). Between September 2026 and October 2026, VetriScience (FoodScience LLC) rose 6.1 points and Zesty Paws rose 9.0 points, both beyond normal variation. Native Pet rose 3.5 points, Nutramax Laboratories rose 2.1 points, Honest Paws rose 3.2 points, and Solid Gold Pet rose 0.4 point, all within normal variation.

Largest Increase: NaturVet

NaturVet posted the largest coverage increase in the category, rising to 31.1% in October 2026 from 23.5% in July 2026, a gain of 7.6 points that moved beyond normal variation. The brand rose in each of the three months since July 2026, reaching 28.3% in August 2026 and 29.9% in September 2026 before closing at 31.1% in October 2026, a streak of three consecutive months of gains. Presence rate rose to 33.1% in October 2026 from 29.9% in July 2026. Top-three rate rose to 22.4% in October 2026 from 11.7% in July 2026. Rank-one rate edged up to 3.1% from 2.5%. The brand recorded 169 valid recommendations in October 2026.

Honest Paws also posted a significant increase over the same period, rising to 12.5% in October 2026 from 8.4% in July 2026, a gain of 4.1 points that moved beyond normal variation. The brand rose in each of the three months since July 2026, reaching 8.8% in August 2026 and 9.3% in September 2026 before closing at 12.5% in October 2026. Presence rate rose to 14.0% in October 2026 from 10.2% in July 2026, top-three rate rose to 8.8% from 6.3%, and rank-one rate edged up to 2.9% from 2.3%. The brand recorded 68 valid recommendations in October 2026.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Largest Decline: Native Pet

Native Pet's valid recommendation coverage fell to 32.4% in October 2026 from 43.6% in July 2026, a decline of 11.2 points that moved beyond normal variation. The series moved down through August 2026 and September 2026 before a partial recovery of 3.5 points into October 2026 within normal variation. The drop appears across supporting signals: presence rate fell to 33.6% in October 2026 from 47.3% in July 2026, and top-three rate fell to 25.6% from 29.9% over the same period. The brand recorded 176 valid recommendations in October 2026.

Category Leader: Zesty Paws

Zesty Paws remained the category leader in valid recommendation coverage at 76.5% in October 2026, up 1.8 points from 74.7% in July 2026. Its top-three rate rose to 69.8% in October 2026 from 54.4% in July 2026, and its rank-one rate rose to 30.1% from 21.5%. The gap to the next brand, VetriScience (FoodScience LLC), stood at 17.1 points in October 2026.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Questions This Section Answers

  • How did top-three and rank-one rates differ among the leading pet supplement brands?
  • Why can close coverage still hide different first-position rates?

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The leading brands show distinct placement patterns.

Brand

Oct 2026 top-three rate

Oct 2026 rank-one rate

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

Zesty Paws

69.8%

30.1%

54.4%

21.5%

VetriScience (FoodScience LLC)

51.5%

18.9%

39.8%

13.9%

Nutramax Laboratories

28.5%

16.4%

29.6%

16.4%

Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates. Zesty Paws holds a 17.1-point coverage lead over VetriScience (FoodScience LLC), yet its rank-one rate in October 2026 is 30.1% against VetriScience's 18.9%, a narrower separation than the coverage gap implies.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which buyer-intent classes were represented in the qualified observations?
  • What has the benchmark not yet measured across pricing and comparison intent?

All qualified observations in each month fell into the Brand Recommendation class.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Oct 2026

Brand Recommendation

605

544

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

605

544

The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Jul 2026

605

Zesty Paws

74.7%

Native Pet, Down 11.2 points (to Oct 2026)

Aug 2026

589

Zesty Paws

72.3%

Native Pet, Down 11.2 points (to Oct 2026)

Sep 2026

582

Zesty Paws

67.5%

Native Pet, Down 11.2 points (to Oct 2026)

Oct 2026

544

Zesty Paws

76.5%

Native Pet, Down 11.2 points

Evidence and Source Layer

Questions This Section Answers

  • What data does each prompt-level observation retain?
  • Does a cited source in an AI answer prove it caused the recommendation?

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure:

  • Market share or attributable sales outcomes.
  • Every possible AI response or surface.
  • Organic-search ranking positions.
  • Social mention volume or sentiment outside AI answer surfaces.
  • Private or sponsored channels.
  • Causality from any single metric movement alone.

Top 10 Cited Domains

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which domains received the most citations in AI answers about pet health supplements?
  • How concentrated were citations across the 1,220 unique domains?
  • Which source types—retail, veterinary, or community—appear most in this vertical's AI answers?

Across all AI platform responses in this measurement period, 6,688 citations were observed spanning 1,220 unique domains.

Rank

Domain

Citations

Share

Platforms citing

1

amazon.com

463

6.9%

Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

2

google.com

353

5.3%

AI Mode, AI Overviews

3

chewy.com

308

4.6%

ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

4

petmd.com

284

4.2%

ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

5

youtube.com

194

2.9%

Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

6

zestypaws.com

150

2.2%

ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

7

akc.org

139

2.1%

ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

8

reddit.com

118

1.8%

ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

9

petco.com

102

1.5%

ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews

10

vetriscience.com

95

1.4%

ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

Citations are broadly distributed rather than concentrated: the top 10 domains account for a combined 32.9% share across 1,220 unique domains. Two tracked brand domains appear in the top 10: zestypaws.com at rank 6 and vetriscience.com at rank 10, both cited across all six canonical surface families. Retail and marketplace sources (amazon.com, chewy.com, petco.com) sit alongside veterinary and informational sources (petmd.com, akc.org) and community or video platforms (reddit.com, youtube.com), suggesting AI answers in this vertical draw on a mix of commerce, expert, and peer sources.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Visibility Market Discovery Index tracks how brands appear, are recommended, and are positioned across major AI chat and search surfaces in a given vertical. It is a neutral, audit-style measurement designed for repeatable month-to-month comparison of presence, valid recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.