Pet Health Supplements and Wellness: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend pet health supplements and wellness. This public AI Visibility Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: NaturVet
- 08Largest Decline: Native Pet
- 09Category Leader: Zesty Paws
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Questions This Section Answers
- Which pet supplement brand led valid recommendation coverage in October 2026?
- Which brands posted the largest coverage gain and decline since July 2026?
Zesty Paws led valid recommendation coverage in October 2026 at 76.5%, ahead of VetriScience (FoodScience LLC) by 17.1 points, which posted 59.4%. The largest coverage increase was NaturVet, rising to 31.1% in October 2026 from 23.5% in July 2026, up 7.6 points. The largest coverage decline was Native Pet, falling to 32.4% in October 2026 from 43.6% in July 2026, down 11.2 points.
Across the full July 2026 to October 2026 series, the month was mixed. NaturVet rose in each of the three months since July 2026, from 23.5% in July 2026 to 28.3% in August 2026, 29.9% in September 2026, and 31.1% in October 2026, the largest baseline-to-current increase in the category. Honest Paws also rose in each of the three months since July 2026, from 8.4% to 8.8% in August 2026, 9.3% in September 2026, and 12.5% in October 2026. Native Pet moved beyond normal variation to the downside across the series, falling from 43.6% in July 2026 to 35.3% in August 2026, 28.9% in September 2026, and 32.4% in October 2026, though it rose 3.5 points from September 2026 within normal variation. Nutramax Laboratories, Solid Gold Pet, VetriScience (FoodScience LLC), and Zesty Paws moved within normal month-to-month variation since baseline, though VetriScience and Zesty Paws each posted prior-month gains that moved beyond normal variation.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 544 qualified observations in October 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Oct 2026
- Zesty Paws76.5%
- VetriScience (FoodScience LLC)59.4%
- Native Pet32.4%
- Nutramax Laboratories32.2%
- NaturVet31.1%
- Honest Paws12.5%
- Solid Gold Pet1.3%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 605 | 544 | Down 61 |
Tracked brands | 7 | 7 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 69.3% | 67.5% | Down 1.8 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 86.9% | 95.6% | Up 8.7 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Zesty Paws (74.7%) | Zesty Paws (76.5%) | Up 1.8 points |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All four months in the series showed all six families present. August 2026 and September 2026, the intermediate months, logged 589 and 582 qualified observations respectively, with Zesty Paws leading both at 72.3% and 67.5%.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Pet Health Supplements and Wellness
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Raw collection universe |
Unique questions | 522 | 558 | Distinct questions asked |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning a brand |
Relevant observations | 786 | 782 | On-topic for the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 14 | 18 | Off-topic for the vertical |
Qualified benchmark observations | 605 | 544 | Public denominator |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. For full methodology, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology.
Current Brand Standings
Questions This Section Answers
- How did the seven tracked pet supplement brands rank by valid recommendation coverage in October 2026?
- Which brands converted presence into top-three recommendations most effectively?
- How did net sentiment compare across the tracked brands?
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zesty Paws | 80.3% | 76.5% | 69.8% | 30.1% | 1.0 |
VetriScience (FoodScience LLC) | 62.0% | 59.4% | 51.5% | 18.9% | 1.0 |
Native Pet | 33.6% | 32.4% | 25.6% | 4.4% | 1.0 |
Nutramax Laboratories | 33.5% | 32.2% | 28.5% | 16.4% | 1.0 |
NaturVet | 33.1% | 31.1% | 22.4% | 3.1% | 0.9 |
Honest Paws | 14.0% | 12.5% | 8.8% | 2.9% | 0.9 |
Solid Gold Pet | 1.5% | 1.3% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.9 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned at all.
- Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand appears with a clearly attributable recommendation.
- Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the first three recommended positions.
- Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the single first recommended option.
- Net sentiment: positive mentions minus negative mentions divided by total mentions, on a scale from -1 to 1.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Questions This Section Answers
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
- Which pet supplement brands gained or lost the most valid recommendation coverage since July 2026?
- Which month-to-month shifts went beyond normal variation?
Brand | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Honest Paws | 8.4% | 12.5% | Up 4.1 points |
Native Pet | 43.6% | 32.4% | Down 11.2 points |
NaturVet | 23.5% | 31.1% | Up 7.6 points |
Nutramax Laboratories | 33.9% | 32.2% | Down 1.7 points |
Solid Gold Pet | 1.8% | 1.3% | Down 0.5 points |
VetriScience (FoodScience LLC) | 54.7% | 59.4% | Up 4.7 points |
Zesty Paws | 74.7% | 76.5% | Up 1.8 points |
From baseline to the current period, NaturVet posted the largest increase in the category (up 7.6 points) and Honest Paws also posted a significant increase (up 4.1 points), while Native Pet posted the largest decline (down 11.2 points). Between September 2026 and October 2026, VetriScience (FoodScience LLC) rose 6.1 points and Zesty Paws rose 9.0 points, both beyond normal variation. Native Pet rose 3.5 points, Nutramax Laboratories rose 2.1 points, Honest Paws rose 3.2 points, and Solid Gold Pet rose 0.4 point, all within normal variation.
Largest Increase: NaturVet
NaturVet posted the largest coverage increase in the category, rising to 31.1% in October 2026 from 23.5% in July 2026, a gain of 7.6 points that moved beyond normal variation. The brand rose in each of the three months since July 2026, reaching 28.3% in August 2026 and 29.9% in September 2026 before closing at 31.1% in October 2026, a streak of three consecutive months of gains. Presence rate rose to 33.1% in October 2026 from 29.9% in July 2026. Top-three rate rose to 22.4% in October 2026 from 11.7% in July 2026. Rank-one rate edged up to 3.1% from 2.5%. The brand recorded 169 valid recommendations in October 2026.
Honest Paws also posted a significant increase over the same period, rising to 12.5% in October 2026 from 8.4% in July 2026, a gain of 4.1 points that moved beyond normal variation. The brand rose in each of the three months since July 2026, reaching 8.8% in August 2026 and 9.3% in September 2026 before closing at 12.5% in October 2026. Presence rate rose to 14.0% in October 2026 from 10.2% in July 2026, top-three rate rose to 8.8% from 6.3%, and rank-one rate edged up to 2.9% from 2.3%. The brand recorded 68 valid recommendations in October 2026.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Largest Decline: Native Pet
Native Pet's valid recommendation coverage fell to 32.4% in October 2026 from 43.6% in July 2026, a decline of 11.2 points that moved beyond normal variation. The series moved down through August 2026 and September 2026 before a partial recovery of 3.5 points into October 2026 within normal variation. The drop appears across supporting signals: presence rate fell to 33.6% in October 2026 from 47.3% in July 2026, and top-three rate fell to 25.6% from 29.9% over the same period. The brand recorded 176 valid recommendations in October 2026.
Category Leader: Zesty Paws
Zesty Paws remained the category leader in valid recommendation coverage at 76.5% in October 2026, up 1.8 points from 74.7% in July 2026. Its top-three rate rose to 69.8% in October 2026 from 54.4% in July 2026, and its rank-one rate rose to 30.1% from 21.5%. The gap to the next brand, VetriScience (FoodScience LLC), stood at 17.1 points in October 2026.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Questions This Section Answers
- How did top-three and rank-one rates differ among the leading pet supplement brands?
- Why can close coverage still hide different first-position rates?
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The leading brands show distinct placement patterns.
Brand | Oct 2026 top-three rate | Oct 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Zesty Paws | 69.8% | 30.1% | 54.4% | 21.5% |
VetriScience (FoodScience LLC) | 51.5% | 18.9% | 39.8% | 13.9% |
Nutramax Laboratories | 28.5% | 16.4% | 29.6% | 16.4% |
Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates. Zesty Paws holds a 17.1-point coverage lead over VetriScience (FoodScience LLC), yet its rank-one rate in October 2026 is 30.1% against VetriScience's 18.9%, a narrower separation than the coverage gap implies.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
Questions This Section Answers
- Which buyer-intent classes were represented in the qualified observations?
- What has the benchmark not yet measured across pricing and comparison intent?
All qualified observations in each month fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 605 | 544 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 605 | 544 |
The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 605 | Zesty Paws | 74.7% | Native Pet, Down 11.2 points (to Oct 2026) |
Aug 2026 | 589 | Zesty Paws | 72.3% | Native Pet, Down 11.2 points (to Oct 2026) |
Sep 2026 | 582 | Zesty Paws | 67.5% | Native Pet, Down 11.2 points (to Oct 2026) |
Oct 2026 | 544 | Zesty Paws | 76.5% | Native Pet, Down 11.2 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
Questions This Section Answers
- What data does each prompt-level observation retain?
- Does a cited source in an AI answer prove it caused the recommendation?
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or attributable sales outcomes.
- Every possible AI response or surface.
- Organic-search ranking positions.
- Social mention volume or sentiment outside AI answer surfaces.
- Private or sponsored channels.
- Causality from any single metric movement alone.
Top 10 Cited Domains
Questions This Section Answers
- Which domains received the most citations in AI answers about pet health supplements?
- How concentrated were citations across the 1,220 unique domains?
- Which source types—retail, veterinary, or community—appear most in this vertical's AI answers?
Across all AI platform responses in this measurement period, 6,688 citations were observed spanning 1,220 unique domains.
Rank | Domain | Citations | Share | Platforms citing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | amazon.com | 463 | 6.9% | Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
2 | google.com | 353 | 5.3% | AI Mode, AI Overviews |
3 | chewy.com | 308 | 4.6% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
4 | petmd.com | 284 | 4.2% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
5 | youtube.com | 194 | 2.9% | Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
6 | zestypaws.com | 150 | 2.2% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
7 | akc.org | 139 | 2.1% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
8 | reddit.com | 118 | 1.8% | ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
9 | petco.com | 102 | 1.5% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews |
10 | vetriscience.com | 95 | 1.4% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
Citations are broadly distributed rather than concentrated: the top 10 domains account for a combined 32.9% share across 1,220 unique domains. Two tracked brand domains appear in the top 10: zestypaws.com at rank 6 and vetriscience.com at rank 10, both cited across all six canonical surface families. Retail and marketplace sources (amazon.com, chewy.com, petco.com) sit alongside veterinary and informational sources (petmd.com, akc.org) and community or video platforms (reddit.com, youtube.com), suggesting AI answers in this vertical draw on a mix of commerce, expert, and peer sources.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Visibility Market Discovery Index tracks how brands appear, are recommended, and are positioned across major AI chat and search surfaces in a given vertical. It is a neutral, audit-style measurement designed for repeatable month-to-month comparison of presence, valid recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment.
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Visibility Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Pet Insurance: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
A benchmark of how six AI platforms compare and recommend pet insurance carriers across multi-pet, senior, wellness, cost, and coverage prompts.
ReadIndustry Reports
Pet Food Delivery Services: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Pet Retail Pet Supplies: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read