CRM Software: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend crm software. This public AI Visibility Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: Pipedrive
- 08Largest Decline: Salesforce Service Cloud
- 09Category Leader: Pipedrive
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Questions This Section Answers
- Which CRM brand leads the October 2026 benchmark, and by how much?
- Which brand recorded the largest coverage decline this month?
Pipedrive leads the CRM Software benchmark in October 2026 with 44.5% valid recommendation coverage, up from 36.3% in July 2026. Pipedrive's lead over the next tracked brand, monday.com at 39.9%, stands at 4.6 points in October 2026, compared with 4.2 points in July 2026.
October 2026 was a mixed month with movement in both directions across the tracked set. The largest coverage increase was Pipedrive, which rose from 41.5% in September 2026 to 44.5% in October 2026, a move of 3.0 points that falls within normal month-to-month variation. The largest coverage decline was Salesforce Service Cloud, which fell from 28.6% in September 2026 to 18.7% in October 2026, a drop of 9.9 points beyond normal variation.
Over the full baseline-to-current series, Pipedrive has increased from 36.3% in July 2026 to 44.5% in October 2026, with coverage at 43.0% in August 2026 and 41.5% in September 2026 along the way. monday.com has risen from 32.1% in July 2026 to 39.9% in October 2026, with coverage ranging between 37.4% and 39.9% across the three months since August 2026. SugarCRM has increased in each of the three months since August 2026, from 2.5% in August 2026 to 4.8% in October 2026.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 461 qualified observations in October 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Oct 2026
- Pipedrive44.5%
- monday.com39.9%
- Salesforce Service Cloud18.7%
- Freshdesk17.8%
- Insightly11.7%
- SugarCRM4.8%
- Keap4.3%
- Zoho Inventory3.2%
- Microsoft SharePoint0.7%
- HubSpot Live Chat0.2%
- **Zoho Expense0.0%
- HubSpot Service Hub0.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 529 | 461 | Down 68 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 31.0% | 49.5% | Up 18.5 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 63.9% | 70.1% | Up 6.2 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Pipedrive (36.3%) | Pipedrive (44.5%) | Leader held |
Recommendation-shaped answer share rose 18.5 points from July 2026 to October 2026, while valid recommendation shortlist share rose 6.2 points over the same period. In August 2026, recommendation-shaped answer share dipped to 23.4%, then rose to 31.5% in September 2026 before reaching 49.5% in October 2026.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Qualified surface breadth reflects the number of canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation. The six families tested are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending CRM Software
Research Scope and Qualification
Questions This Section Answers
- How many prompt-surface observations qualified for the CRM benchmark in October 2026?
- Why do brand-level percentages use qualified observations instead of the raw collection?
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompt-surface combinations collected before any filtering |
Unique questions | 554 | 590 | Distinct question texts across the collection |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Observations in which at least one brand or competitor was mentioned |
Relevant observations | 696 | 628 | Observations meeting relevance criteria for the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 104 | 172 | Observations not meeting relevance criteria |
Qualified benchmark observations | 529 | 461 | Public denominator for all brand-level percentages |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. For methodology details, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology.
Current Brand Standings
Questions This Section Answers
- Which CRM brands have the highest valid recommendation coverage?
- How do presence, top-three rate, and rank-one rate differ across the ranked brands?
This table presents the primary current-month benchmark view for October 2026, sorted by valid recommendation coverage.
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pipedrive | 65.1% | 44.5% | 23.2% | 3.0% | 0.7 |
monday.com | 59.2% | 39.9% | 12.6% | 3.5% | 0.7 |
Salesforce Service Cloud | 28.2% | 18.7% | 10.4% | 3.9% | 0.7 |
Freshdesk | 27.8% | 17.8% | 9.5% | 1.1% | 0.7 |
Insightly | 19.3% | 11.7% | 3.0% | 0.9% | 0.7 |
SugarCRM | 10.4% | 4.8% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.5 |
Keap | 7.6% | 4.3% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.7 |
Zoho Inventory | 3.9% | 3.2% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 0.8 |
Microsoft SharePoint | 1.5% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.6 |
HubSpot Live Chat | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 1.0 |
\*\*Zoho Expense | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: the share of qualified observations in which the brand appears at all, whether recommended, mentioned, or discussed.
- Valid recommendation coverage: the share of qualified observations in which the brand appears in a recommendation that meets the benchmark's quality rules. This is the primary metric.
- Top-three rate: the share of qualified observations in which the brand is recommended in the top three positions.
- Rank-one rate: the share of qualified observations in which the brand is recommended first.
- Net sentiment: positive minus negative mentions divided by the total number of mentions carrying sentiment, bounded from -1 to +1.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Questions This Section Answers
- Which CRM brands gained or lost the most recommendation coverage since the July 2026 baseline?
- How much did Pipedrive and Salesforce Service Cloud move over that period?
The table shows valid recommendation coverage movement from the July 2026 baseline to October 2026.
Brand | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Pipedrive | 36.3% | 44.5% | Up 8.2 points |
monday.com | 32.1% | 39.9% | Up 7.8 points |
Salesforce Service Cloud | 31.2% | 18.7% | Down 12.5 points |
Freshdesk | 27.0% | 17.8% | Down 9.2 points |
Insightly | 11.3% | 11.7% | Up 0.4 points |
SugarCRM | 1.5% | 4.8% | Up 3.3 points |
Keap | 8.1% | 4.3% | Down 3.8 points |
Zoho Inventory | 0.0% | 3.2% | Up 3.2 points |
Microsoft SharePoint | 0.4% | 0.7% | Up 0.3 points |
HubSpot Live Chat | 0.0% | 0.2% | Up 0.2 points |
HubSpot Service Hub | 34.6% | 0.0% | Down 34.6 points |
\*\*Zoho Expense | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
In more recent movement, HubSpot Live Chat declined 3.7 points from September 2026 to October 2026. Zoho Inventory declined 6.0 points over the same period.
Largest Increase: Pipedrive
Pipedrive recorded the largest coverage increase from July 2026 to October 2026, rising from 36.3% to 44.5% valid recommendation coverage, a gain of 8.2 points. The brand's coverage moved from 36.3% in July 2026 to 43.0% in August 2026, 41.5% in September 2026, and 44.5% in October 2026, ending the period above its baseline level. Presence rose from 57.1% in July 2026 to 65.1% in October 2026, and top-three placement increased from 15.3% to 23.2% over the same period.
Largest Decline: Salesforce Service Cloud
Salesforce Service Cloud recorded the largest coverage decline from July 2026 to October 2026, falling from 31.2% to 18.7% valid recommendation coverage, a drop of 12.5 points. The brand declined from 28.6% in September 2026 to 18.7% in October 2026, a single-month drop of 9.9 points. Presence fell from 45.2% in July 2026 to 28.2% in October 2026, and top-three placement declined from 17.2% to 10.4% over the same period.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Category Leader: Pipedrive
Pipedrive holds the category lead in October 2026 with 44.5% valid recommendation coverage, up from 36.3% in July 2026. The brand has held the leadership position in each of the four measured months. Its lead over the next brand widened from 4.2 points in July 2026 to 4.6 points in October 2026.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Questions This Section Answers
- Which leading CRM brand is recommended most often in the top three positions?
- Can a brand have similar rank-one rates despite a large coverage gap?
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The October 2026 placement data for the leading cluster shows differences between top-three and rank-one rates.
Brand | Oct 2026 top-three rate | Oct 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Pipedrive | 23.2% | 3.0% | 15.3% | 1.3% |
monday.com | 12.6% | 3.5% | 8.7% | 3.2% |
Salesforce Service Cloud | 10.4% | 3.9% | 17.2% | 8.1% |
Near-equal coverage can still hide different first-position rates. Salesforce Service Cloud recorded a rank-one rate of 3.9% in October 2026, nearly matching monday.com at 3.5%, despite trailing monday.com on coverage by 21.2 points.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
Questions This Section Answers
- Which buyer-intent classes are represented in the qualified CRM benchmark observations?
- Are Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison observations included in the current series?
All qualified benchmark observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, which captures discovery and consideration behavior.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 529 | 461 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 529 | 461 |
The current public series measures the Brand Recommendation class of discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 529 | Pipedrive | 36.3% | Baseline |
Aug 2026 | 509 | Pipedrive | 43.0% | HubSpot Service Hub down 34.6 points |
Sep 2026 | 489 | Pipedrive | 41.5% | Salesforce Service Cloud up 3.5 points |
Oct 2026 | 461 | Pipedrive | 44.5% | Salesforce Service Cloud down 9.9 points |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or attributable sales
- Every possible AI response a given model can produce
- Organic-search ranking positions
- Social media mention volume
- Private or sponsored channels such as gated enterprise pilots or paid placements
- Causality from a metric movement alone, since movements can reflect prompt mix, sample composition, or surface availability rather than brand actions
Top 10 Cited Domains
Questions This Section Answers
- Which domains are cited most often in AI responses about CRM software?
- How concentrated are CRM citations across the top domains?
Across all AI platform responses in October 2026, the benchmark recorded 6,528 total citations from 1,624 unique domains.
Rank | Domain | Citations | Share | Platforms citing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | youtube.com | 468 | 7.2% | ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
2 | google.com | 202 | 3.1% | AI Mode, AI Overviews |
3 | salesforce.com | 188 | 2.9% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
4 | reddit.com | 187 | 2.9% | Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
5 | zapier.com | 180 | 2.8% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
6 | monday.com | 165 | 2.5% | ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
7 | zendesk.com | 139 | 2.1% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
8 | pipedrive.com | 124 | 1.9% | ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
9 | g2.com | 104 | 1.6% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
10 | zoho.com | 82 | 1.3% | ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
Citations are concentrated in a small number of domains, with the top 10 accounting for 27.1% of all citations. Three tracked brands' own domains appear in the top 10: salesforce.com at rank 3, monday.com at rank 6, and pipedrive.com at rank 8. The sources shaping AI recommendations in this vertical span video platforms, search engines, community forums, workflow tools, review sites, and official brand properties, with no single source type dominating the list.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Visibility Market Discovery Index tracks how AI and search surfaces discover, mention, and recommend brands across a defined vertical. It is a neutral, observation-based benchmark built from prompt-level data across six canonical AI/search surface families.
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Visibility Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Procurement Software: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
eSignature Software: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
SIEM Software: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read