Credit Repair: AI Market Discovery Index

Benchmark Summary

Credit Saint remained the coverage leader in August 2026 with 64.3% valid recommendation coverage, holding a 52.5 percentage point lead over CreditRepair.com. August 2026 was a quiet month for the category: none of the five tracked brands moved beyond the normal month-to-month variation the benchmark's significance gate applies to their series, and the leader, gap ordering, and buyer-intent mix were unchanged from July 2026.

Within that normal range, CreditRepair.com's valid recommendation coverage moved up to 11.8% in August 2026 from 10.1% in July 2026, and Credit Saint's coverage moved down to 64.3% from 68.9%. The Credit Pros moved down to 35.3% from 38.0%, Lexington Law moved down to 24.6% from 28.3%, and Dovly moved down to 11.8% from 12.9%. Each of these changes stays inside the range the benchmark treats as ordinary variation for that brand, so none represents a significant shift on its own.

Across the two-month series from the July 2026 baseline to the August 2026 current period, Credit Saint's coverage is down 4.6 percentage points, Lexington Law is down 3.7 points, The Credit Pros is down 2.7 points, Dovly is down 1.1 points, and CreditRepair.com is up 1.7 points. All five brands remain classified as stable across the series.

The benchmark began with 738 prompt-surface observations in August 2026 and produced 272 qualified observations after qualification.

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Qualified surface breadth counts the six canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Credit Repair

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology.

Current Brand Standings

How to Read the Standings

• Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the AI response.
• Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the AI provides a valid recommendation including the brand.
• Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is recommended in the first three positions.
• Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is recommended first.
• Net sentiment: positive minus negative mention sentiment, scaled.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

August 2026 was a quiet month across the category: all five brands stayed within the range of normal month-to-month variation on valid recommendation coverage, and none posted a move large enough to break its prior direction or establish a new multi-month streak.

Category Leader: Credit Saint

Credit Saint remained the category leader in August 2026 with 64.3% valid recommendation coverage, ahead of The Credit Pros at 35.3% and Lexington Law at 24.6%. Its lead over CreditRepair.com, the brand tracked for gap purposes, narrowed to 52.5 percentage points in August 2026 from 58.8 percentage points in July 2026.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The leading brands show distinct placement profiles in August 2026:

Credit Saint converted most of its coverage into first-position recommendations, while The Credit Pros appeared in the top three more often but rarely first. Similar coverage levels can still hide very different first-position rates.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in August 2026 fell into the Brand Recommendation class, focused on which credit repair provider to choose. July 2026 also had all 318 qualified observations in this class.

The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

Evidence and Source Layer

This benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often and how prominently brands appear in AI-generated answers across the six canonical AI/search surface families. Monthly measurements are added to an evergreen report.

• AI Market Discovery Methodology
• AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
• AI Market Discovery Research Standards
• Modeled AI Authority Value

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index